بررسی بومی‌سازی مؤلفه انصاف در روایی ساخت آزمون‌های سرنوشت‌ساز با تأکید بر فقه تربیتی

منابع

1. اعرافی، علیرضا (1395)، تأثیرات فقه بر نظام تربیتی، راهبرد فرهنگ، شماره ششم. 114 _ 131.

2. اعرافی، علیرضا (1391)، فقه تربیتی: مبانی و پیش‌فرض‌ها، تحقیق و نگارش: سید نقی موسوی، قم: مؤسسه فرهنگی اشراق و عرفان

3. بناری، علی همت (1381)، «نگاهی به تعامل فقه و تربیت با تأکید بر نقش فقه در تربیت»، معرفت، شماره 57، 37 _ 49.

4. بناری، علی همت (1383). نگرشی بر تعامل فقه و تربیت، قم: انتشارات مؤسسه آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینی؟ره؟.

5. ترکاشوند، سینا، کشاورز، سوسن، صالحی، اکبر، میرزامحمدی، محمد حسن، «ارائه الگوی نظری عدالت تربیتی در نظام تعلیم و تربیت رسمی و عمومی براساس مبانی معرف تشناختی عدالت فارابی»، مسائل کاربردی تعلیم و تربیت اسلامی، دوره سوم، شماره نهم، 7 _ 34.

6. سرمدی، محمدرضا، معصومی فرد، مرجان (1394)، «جایگاه عدالت آموزشی در تحول نظام تعلیم و تربیت مبتنی بر سازنده‌گرایی. پژوهش در یادگیری آموزشگاهی و مجازی»، دوره دهم، شماره سوم، 63 _ 70.

7. الهی خراسانی، علی (1387)، «قاعده عدل و انصاف»، قواعد فقه قضا و حکومت، جستار، دوره ششم، شماره بیستم، 10 _ 34.

8. طرقی، مجید، ابراهیمی، جواد (1397)، «تربیت اجتماعی از منظر فقهی، مبتنی بر نظام قواعد فقهی»، مطالعات فقه تربیتی، دوره پنجم، شماره نهم، 37 _ 62.

منابع لاتین

1. Alon, S., & Tienda, M. (2007). Diversity, opportunity, and the shifting meritocracy in higher education. American Sociological Review, 72, 487–511.

2. Angoff,W. H. (1993). Perspectives on differential item functioning methodology. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.) , Differential item functioning (pp. 3–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

3. Bolger, N. & Kellaghan, T. (1990). Method of measurement and gender differences in Scholastic Achievement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 165 _ 174.

4. Chaloub _ Deville, M. (2015). Validity theory: Reform, policies, accountability testing, and Consequences. Language Testing, 1 _ 20.

5. Clapham, C. (1996). The development of IELTS: A study of the effect of background knowledge on reading comprehension. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate and Cambridge University Press.

6. Davies, A. (2010). Test fairness: A response. Language Testing, 27, 171–176.

7. Gipps, C. & Stobart, G. (2009). Fairness in assessment. In C. Wyatt _ Smith & J. Cumming (Eds.) , Educational assessment in 21st century: Connecting theory and practice (pp. 105 _ 118). Netherlands: Springer Science and Business Media.

8. Johnson, D. (2008). Stop high _ stakes testing: An appeal to America’s conscience. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

9. Kiani, G.R; Alibakhshi, G & Akbari, R (2009). On the consequential validity of ESP tests: a qualitative study in Iran. The journal of applied linguistics, 2 (1) , 103 _ 126.

10. Kane, M. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50 (1) , 1 _ 73.

11. Kunnan, A. J. (2000). Fairness and justice for all. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.) , Fairness and validation in language assessment (pp. 1–14). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

12. Kunnan, A. J. (2004). Test fairness. In Milanovic, M. & Weir C., (Eds.) , European language testing in a global context: Proceedings of the ALTE Barcelona Conference (pp. 27–48). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

13. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2005). Understanding language teaching: From method to post method. Mahvah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

14. Lei, X. (2007). Shanghai gaokao yingyu fenshu de xingbie chayi he yuanying [Gender differences and their sources on the National Maculation English Test in the Shanghai area]. Shanghai Research on Education, 6, 43 _ 46.

15. Marchus, J. (2013). Barefaced cheating in China’s bull market for student fraud. The Times Higher Education Supplement, 20.35 _ 65.

16. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Kenneth, D. B. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11, 219 _ 232.

17. McNamara, T., & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

18. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.) , Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13– 103). New York, NY: American Council on Education and Macmillan.

19. Noddings, N. (2004). High stakes testing, why? Theory and research in Education, 2, 263 _ 269.

20. Nunan, D. (1995). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. Phoenix, ELT.

21. Phelps, R. P. (2008). The role and importance of standardized testing in the world of teaching and training. Nonpartisan Education review, 4, 1 _ 9.

22. Pitoniak, M. J. & Royer, J. M. (2001). Testing Accommodations for Examinees With Disabilities: A Review of Psychometric, Legal, and Social Policy Issues. Review of Educational Research, 71, 53 _ 104.

23. Schaefer, E. (2008). Rater bias patterns in an EFL writing assessment. Language Testing, 25, 465 _ 493.

24. Sackett, P. R., Borneman, M. J., & Connelly, B. S. (2008). High stakes testing in higher education and employment: Appraising the evidence for validity and fairness. American Psychologist, 63, 215 _ 227.

25. Thurlow, M. L., Thompson, S. J., & Lazarus, S. S. (2006). Considerations for the administration of tests to special needs students: Accommodations, modifications, and more. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.) Handbook of test development (pp. 653 _ 76). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum

26. Toulmin, S. (1958) , The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

27. Walberg, H. J. (2004). Examinations for educational productivity. In W. M. Evers & H. J. Walberg. Testing student learning, evaluating teaching effectiveness (pp. 3 _ 26). Hoover Intuition Press.

28. Walpole, M., P.M. McDonough, C.J. Bauer, C. Gibson, K. Kanyi and R. Toliver. (2005). This test is unfair: Urban African American and Latino high school students’ perceptions of standardised college admission tests. Urban Education, 40, 321– 349.

29. Willingham, W. W. (1999). A systemic view of test fairness. In Messick S. (Ed.) , Assessment in higher education: Issues in access, quality, student development, and public policy (pp. 213–242). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

30. Xi, X. (2008). Methods of Test Validation. In Shohamy, E., and Hornberger, N. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 2nd Edition, Volume 7: Language Testing and Assessment (pp. 177–196). New York, NY: Springer.

31. Xi, X. (2010). How do we go about investigating test fairness? Language Testing, 27, 147– 170.

32. Zwick, R. (2006). Higher education admission testing. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.) , Educational measurement (pp. 647 _ 80). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.