اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات120
تعداد شماره‌ها1,350
تعداد مقالات10,139
تعداد مشاهده مقاله3,046,943
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله1,720,371
Pinkas, Ronen. (1400). Animal rights – Jewish perspectives. مطالعات فلسفی کلامی, 3(1), -. doi: 10.53100/bvnmxbhgbhgjb
Ronen Pinkas. "Animal rights – Jewish perspectives". مطالعات فلسفی کلامی, 3, 1, 1400, -. doi: 10.53100/bvnmxbhgbhgjb
Pinkas, Ronen. (1400). 'Animal rights – Jewish perspectives', مطالعات فلسفی کلامی, 3(1), pp. -. doi: 10.53100/bvnmxbhgbhgjb
Pinkas, Ronen. Animal rights – Jewish perspectives. مطالعات فلسفی کلامی, 1400; 3(1): -. doi: 10.53100/bvnmxbhgbhgjb

Animal rights – Jewish perspectives

Zeitschrift für islamische Philosophie, Theologie und Mystik
دوره 3، شماره 1، 2021    اصل مقاله (4.86 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.53100/bvnmxbhgbhgjb
نویسنده
Ronen Pinkas
School of Jewish Theology der Universität Potsdam Germany
چکیده
This article raises the question why is it that, despite Jewish tradition devoting much thought to the status and treatment of animals and showing strict adherence to the notion of preventing their pain and suffering, ethical attitudes to animals are not dealt with systematically in the writings of Jewish philosophers and have not received sufficient attention in the context of moral monotheism. What has prevented the expansion of the golden rule: „Love your fellow as yourself: I am the LORD“ (Lev 19,18) and „That which is hateful to you do not do to another“ (BT Shabbat 31a:6; JT Nedarim 30b:1) to animals? Why is it that the moral responsibility for the fellow-man, the neighbor, or the other, has been understood as referring only to a human companion? Does the demand for absolute moral responsibility spoken from the face of the other, which Emmanuel Levinas emphasized in his ethics, not radiate from the face of the non-human other as well? Levinas’s ethics explicitly negates the principle of reciprocity and moral symmetry: The ‚I‘ is committed to the other, regardless of the other’s attitude towards him. Does the affinity to the eternal Thou which Martin Buber also discovers in plants and animals not require a paradigmatic change in the attitude towards animals?
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 168
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 250


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب