اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات120
تعداد شماره‌ها1,350
تعداد مقالات10,139
تعداد مشاهده مقاله3,047,143
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله1,720,466
Fattahizadeh, Fathiyeh, Abadi, Fatemeh. (1403). Analysis of Polysemy in Modal Structures of the Holy Quran Based on Force Schema: A Case Study of Jaʿala, ʿAsā, and Laʿalla. مطالعات فلسفی کلامی, 3(8), 51-79. doi: 10.22034/qns.2024.18782.1073
Fathiyeh Fattahizadeh; Fatemeh Abadi. "Analysis of Polysemy in Modal Structures of the Holy Quran Based on Force Schema: A Case Study of Jaʿala, ʿAsā, and Laʿalla". مطالعات فلسفی کلامی, 3, 8, 1403, 51-79. doi: 10.22034/qns.2024.18782.1073
Fattahizadeh, Fathiyeh, Abadi, Fatemeh. (1403). 'Analysis of Polysemy in Modal Structures of the Holy Quran Based on Force Schema: A Case Study of Jaʿala, ʿAsā, and Laʿalla', مطالعات فلسفی کلامی, 3(8), pp. 51-79. doi: 10.22034/qns.2024.18782.1073
Fattahizadeh, Fathiyeh, Abadi, Fatemeh. Analysis of Polysemy in Modal Structures of the Holy Quran Based on Force Schema: A Case Study of Jaʿala, ʿAsā, and Laʿalla. مطالعات فلسفی کلامی, 1403; 3(8): 51-79. doi: 10.22034/qns.2024.18782.1073

Analysis of Polysemy in Modal Structures of the Holy Quran Based on Force Schema: A Case Study of Jaʿala, ʿAsā, and Laʿalla

The Quran: Contemporary Studies
دوره 3، شماره 8، مهر 2024، صفحه 51-79    اصل مقاله (670.04 K)
نوع مقاله: Scholary
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/qns.2024.18782.1073
نویسندگان
Fathiyeh Fattahizadeh1؛ Fatemeh Abadi* 2
1Professor in the Department of Quranic Studies and Hadith, Faculty of Theology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
2Postdoctoral Researcher, in the Department of Quranic Studies and Hadith, Faculty of Theology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran & member of the Quranic and hadith interdisciplinary studies research group
چکیده
In the classical view of grammar, modal structures are merely combinations of logical and homonymous operators with their root theme; however, the cognitive view considers the modal meaning of verbs an extension of their root-physical meaning. This research is a case study of three grammatical categories of “jaʿala,” “ʿasā,” and “laʿalla” in the Quran to explain the relationship between the root meaning and the modal meaning of these grammatical categories based on the force schema. The examination showed that the modal meaning of “jaʿala” is derived from the metaphorical extension of the root meaning of to build and to place; concerning God, it means the presence of sufficient force, and in relation to agents other than God, it refers to the lack of enough power. “ʿasā” and “laʿalla” have similar meanings and functions, and their modal meaning is derived from the root meaning of to do to the components of removal or absence of restraints and the presence of sufficient force (which, in human physical experience, is essential to acting) in a graded manner. Reference to the removal or absence of restraints approximates the meaning of “ʿasā” and “laʿalla” to possibility, and reference to the presence of sufficient force approximates their meaning to certainty.
 
کلیدواژه‌ها
modality؛ force schema؛ polysemy؛ Holy Quran؛ Jaʿala؛ ʿAsā؛ Laʿalla
مراجع

Qarai, Ali Quli. Trans. (2005). The Quran: With a Phrase-by-Phrase English Translation (2nd ed.). London: ICAS Press.

ʿAbdul Bāqī, Muḥammad Fuā’d. (1364H/1944). Al-Muʿjam al-mufahras li-l-alfāẓ al-Qur’ān al-Karīm. Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah.

Anṣāriyān, Ḥusayn. (1383Sh/2004).Tarjumah-ye Qur’ān-i Karīm (Translation of the Noble Quran). Qum: Uswah.

ʿArūsī Ḥuwayzī, ʿAbd Ali b. Jumʿa. (1415AH/1994). Tafsīr nūr al-thaqalayn (4th ed.). Qum: Ismāʿiliyān Publications.

Azharī, Muḥammad b. Aḥmad. (1421H/2001). Tahdhīb al-lughah. Beirut: dar Iḥyā al-Turāth al-ʿArabī.

Brun, J. (1895). Dictionarium Syriaco-Latinum. Beryti Phoeniciorum: Typogr. PP. Soc. Jesu.

Campbell, Lyle, and Mauricio Mixco. (2007). A Glossary of Historical Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Coffin, Edna Amir, and Shmuel Bolozky. (2005). A Reference Grammar of Modern Hebrew. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Costaz, Louis. (2002). Dictionarie Syriaque-Francais/ Syriac-English Dictionary. Beirut: Dar El-Machreq.

Cruse, Alan. (2006). Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Fakhr al-Dīn Rāzī, Muḥammad. (1420H/2000). Mafātīḥ al-ghayb. Beirut: Dār al-Iḥyā al-Turāth al-ʿArabī.

Farāhīdī, Khalīl b. Aḥmad. (1409H/1989). Al-ʿAyn. Qum: Hijrat.

Feyerabend, Karl. (n.d.). A Complete Hebrew-English Pocket-Dictionary to the Old Testament. London: H. Grevrl & co.

Franks, David. (2010). Neurosociology: The Nexus Between Neuroscience and Social Psychology. New York: Springer.

Gesenius, Wilhelm. (1939). A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament: Including the Biblical Chaldee. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ghalāyīnī, Muṣṭafā. (1405H/1985). Jāmiʿ al-durūs al-ʿArabiyyah. Beirut: Dār al-kuj lil-tiba’a wa al-Nashr.

Glinert, Lewis. (2004). The Grammar of Modern Hebrew. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Ibn ʿAṭiyyah, ʿAbd al-Ḥaqq. (1422H/2001). Al-Muḥarrar al-wajīz fī tafsīr al-kitāb al-ʿazīz. Beirut: Dār al-kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

Ibn Durayd, Muḥammad. (1408H/1988). Jamharat al-lughah. Beirut: Dār al-ʿIlm li-l-Malāyīn.

Ibn Manẓūr, Muḥammad ibn Mukram. (1414AH/1993). Lisān al-ʿArab. Beirut: Dār al-Ṣadr

Ibn Sayyidih, ʿAlī. (1421H/2000). Al-Muḥkam wa al-muḥīṭ al-aʿẓam. Edited by A. H. Hindawi. Beirut: Dār al-kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

Ilāhī Qumshe’ī, Mahdī. (1379Sh/2001). Tarjumah-ye Qur’ān-i Karīm (Translation of the Noble Quran). Qum: Fāṭima al-Zahrā’.

Imīl Badīʿ, Yaʿqūb. (1409H/1988). Mawsūat al-naḥw wa al-ṣarf wa al-iʿrāb. Beirut: Dār al-ʿIlm li-l-Malāyīn.

Jastrow, Marcus. (1903). A Dictionary of the Targumim: The Talmud Babli and Yerushalmi and the Midrashic Literature. London: Luzac & Company.

Javādī Āmulī, ʿAbdullāh. (1387Sh/2009). Adab-i fanā-ye muqarrabān. Qum: Isra.

Jawharī, Ismāʿīl b. Ḥammād. (1376H/1956). Al-Ṣiḥāḥ. Beirut: Dar al-ʿIlm Li-l-Malāyīn.

Johnson, Mark. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Johnson, Mark. (2005). “The philosophical significance of image schemas.” In B. Hampe (Ed.), From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 15-34). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.

Kovecses, Zoltan. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. (1999). Philosophy In the Flesh: The Embodied Mind And Its Challenge To Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

Lakoff, George. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lee, David. (2001). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Translated by J. Mirzābeigī. Tehran: Agah.

Littlemore, Jeanette, and John Taylor. (2014). The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Mashkūr, Muḥammad Javād. (1357Sh/1978). Farhang-i taṭbīqī-ye ʿArabī bā zabān-hā-ye Sāmī wa Irānī (Comparative Dictionary of Arabic, Semitic, and Iranian Languages). Iran: Bunyād-i Farhang-i Iran.

Muṣṭafavī, Ḥasan. (1403H/1982). Al-Taḥqīq fī kalimāt al-Qur’ān al-Karīm. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

Orel, Vladimir, and Olga Stolbova. (1995). Hamito-Semitic Etymological Dictionary. New York: Leiden.

Palmer, Frank Robert. (1981). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Prochazka, Stephan. (2009). Arabic in Concise Encyclopedia of Languages of the World. Edited by K. Brown and S. Ogilvie. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Qurṭubī, Muḥammad b. Aḥmad. (1405H/1985). Al-Jāmiʿ li aḥkām al-Qur’ān. Tehran: Nāṣir Khusraw.

Rāghib Iṣfahānī, Ḥusayn b. Muḥammad. (1412H/1991). Mufradāt-i alfāẓ-i al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Qalam.

Sweetser, E. (1991). From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ṭabrisī, Faḍl b. Ḥasan. (1372Sh/1993). Majmaʿ al-bayān fī tafsīr al-Quran (3rd ed.). Tehran: Nasir Khusru Publications.

Taylor, John. (2003). Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ungerer, Friedrich, and Hans-Jorg Schmid. (2006). An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Translated by J. Mirzābeigī. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.

Wolfensohn, Israel. (1348AH/1929). Tārīkh al-lughāt al-Sāmiyyah. Translated by Abū Dhu’ayb. Egypt: Iʿtimād.

Zamakhsharī, Maḥmūd b. ʿUmar. (1400H/1979). Asās al-balāghah. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir.

Zamakhsharī, Maḥmūd b. ʿUmar. (1407H/1987). Al-Kashshāf ʿan ḥaqā’iq al-tanzīl. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-ʿArabī.

Zammit, Martin R. (2002). A Comparative Lexical Study of Qurʼānic Arabic. Leiden: Brill.

Zubaydī, Murtiḍā. (1414H/1993). Tāj al-ʿarūs. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 130
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 94


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب